Oldtimers TV

@castorabc9 totally agree. the most up to date car ever built in f1 is the williams renault from 1993

Great to see this lap on the old circuit of Zandvoort !

Turbo F1 cars way back.. Very brutal..

@martynhenrystyles you try to drive one motherfucker!!!!! grow some balls and stick to nascar

@castorabc9, that’s relative. articles can mess everything up, just to inform, so don’t trust everything.

@KillerDreck89 go to the aF1 website and look up brakes, it clearly sais ABS are banned

@castorabc9, you say there are no anti locks because you also haven’t seen any? well, you better look into the cars more carefully.

@KillerDreck89 loser!!!!, have you seen when the cars lock of the tires going into some turns???? THEY DONT HAVE ANTI LOCK BRAKES!!! i dont care what other users think.

@budbadbig can you give us some lap times to justify this comment.

@aaron0288 think so too

@castorabc9, don’t call me a loser again. are you an engineer or what?
1) New cars: No TC, that’s right for now.
2) Not only stability computer, but many other cumputer systems.
3) But when U said new cars don’t have ABS, you lie.
4) No problem, sure I would rather drive old F1 cars than those robots.
But after all, ask other users, they would only partially agree to you?

@KillerDreck89 by the way loser, u should read up before runnign your mouth!!! New F1 cars dont have traction corntrol, dont have stability control(computer), and dont have anti lock brakes!!!! watch top gear when richard hammond drives the renault F1!!!! u try to drive one you loser!!!!!! go race ur honda civic and quit talking shit!!!!!!! stick to nascar!!!!

@aaron0288 did you see the canadian grand prix? they couldn’t get close to the lap record, 2 seconds off! the aerodynamics aren’t as good any more and they don’t have the launch control and traction control that they used to. they were all banned to make the races slower (and therefore safer) with more possibility of overtaking and therefore more exciting. The cars were at their fastest in 2005/2006.

sounds like a beauty

Regarding when F1 was the most gutsy: I think 1969 was the eclipse. It was the last year of the unfiltered courses, before they cut the bumps off the beloved and feared Green Hell and before they “nuded” Spa into a safety haven. Yes, ppl died, but that was the risks. It was more do-or-die, no-padding, raw-guts then. No room for err and they knew it, losing 1 buddy pr year average. Maybe Stewart was right to campaign for safety, but F1 lost its history.

@unionrdr Ster…WHAT?..I CANT HEAR WHAT YOURE SAYING, THE ENGINE IS SOO LOUD!…:))

@castorabc9, who talks shit? The new formula cars are just computers, not only with driving aids, but many more things are computer-aided.

All men who drive F1 have balls, you cant say modern men suck because i want to see all of u get in f1 cars u cunts!!!!!!!! Maybey it was harder but dat doesnt mean anything!! New ones dont have ABS an you have 700hp pushing you so i wouldnt be talking, why do you thing there is only 24 men in F1, because they are the best of the best, sodont talk shit!!!

Aaaah yes,the flyin scot back when it was 90% driver & 10% car. Not whoever has the biggest wallet wins. Ans such major ear candy too. With an exhaust tone like that,who needs a stereo?

Grand Prix… James Garner…

That’s what modern F1 is missing!

supersevenn.
as opposed to todays formula 1 drivers who are what, fake men?

one word:

EARGASM!!

The car in the 2nd clip is a Renault RE40 Turbo from 1983, driven by Alain Prost. Turbos still didn’t develop around 1000 hp back then. In 1983, the venerable Cosworth V8 developed around 550 hp and teams running on NA could still win a few races.

Titanium….

Whatever that means.